If we’re talking decade-long depth, it’s hard to beat the 2000s West. Case for Kobe: You had Duncan’s Spurs, Dirk’s Mavs, Nash’s Suns, Webber’s Kings, KG’s Wolves, Yao/T-Mac Rockets, etc.—multiple 55–60 win outfits at the same time. The 2001 Lakers ran a historic gauntlet, beating four 50-win teams on the way to the title (three in the West, plus the 56-win Sixers) and went 15–1. From ’08–’10, Kobe went through a steady stream of 50-win clubs (Jazz/Nuggets/Suns) and then Celtics/Magic in the Finals. Those runs are criminally underrated. Case for MJ: Early 90s East still had Bad Boy residue, then the 57-win Knicks, Price/Daugherty Cavs, and later Reggie’s Pacers. Chicago usually was the 60-win buzzsaw everyone else had to survive. So, which specific run felt toughest to you? ’01 Lakers or ’93/’98 Bulls? #NBA #Kobe #Jordan #GOATDebate #Playoffs #Lakers #Bulls